Posts Tagged ‘subscriptions’

Diversity

Monday, September 13th, 2010
Diversity is good in all aspects of life – in the workplace environment, in the gene pool, and even in business models.  On the latter topic, we spend a lot of time both internally and with our clients discussing and implementing best practices, and it was in the course of one such discussion that the concept of diversity really hit home.  

The client in question had seen a slight drop in subscribers.  We were initially puzzled that their overall revenues were up despite this subscriber drop, when we remembered that they also generated revenue from add-on microtransactions.  Sure enough, the revenue from existing subscribers buying additional items via microtransactions exceeded the lost revenue from those who unsubscribed, proving the old axiom that your loyal customers are willing to pay even more than what you charge them.  We investigated this trend across our client base and found that hybrid business models like the one above can add between 8-10% to the average revenue per user (ARPU).

We have two upcoming conversations on business models.  On Wednesday, Jeremy Nusser discusses free and freemium to kick off our Fall 2010 Webinar series.  Next week our CEO, Gene Hoffman, talks on a panel at the NY Games Conference about payment models that work.  We encourage you to join the debate.

Customer Retention – the little stuff matters

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

The three tenets of our CashBox solution are 1) to increase customer acquisition, 2) maximize customer retention, and 3) enable operational excellence for online merchants that sell digital goods & services to consumers and small business (SMB).

Acquisition is straightforward – allow consumers to choose the right product / plan at the right price in the correct language and currency, and to pay in their payment method of choice.

Operational excellence around billing and customer information is also obvious – securely store all sensitive data while managing and nurturing the overall customer relationship (PCI DSS & SOX are methods of enforcing parts of this).

Where the waters get a bit murky for some folks is customer retention…

The concept is simple. If a transaction fails, try it again, and again, and again. However, retention involves multiple moving parts, so every little detail matters and the compound effect of many small tweaks can be quite large. Some factors that make an impact on retention include:

  • Failure type
  • System availability
  • Transaction type (one-time, subscription, etc)
  • Time since last billing
  • Time between retries
  • Number of retries
  • Payment processor used
  • Transaction routing (# of stops along the way)

Many of these factors are specific to the business model used (Time between billings, transaction type) and some are the result of merchant preference (time between retries, number of retries). Yet others are system related (payment processor, transaction routing, system availability). While the first two areas can experience continual improvement with testing and optimization, the system related issues are *somewhat*out of control of the merchant. The *somewhat* refers to the fact that merchants have a choice of business partners.

Let’s take a closer look at the three system-related factors listed and how we address them.

  • System availability
    • The uptime of connections to the payment processor from the gateway, and the connection from the payment processor to the Interchange.
    • Vindicia: Part of our solution to this problem is a built-in gateway in order to eliminate uptime issues between the billing system and the payment processor. We also have hardware directly in the datacenters of certain partners with direct connections to further reduce any connectivity issues. As a final step, if the payment processor’s connection is down, we automatically queue the transactions for retry.
  • Transaction Routing
    • The number of systems involved in submitting a transaction makes a big difference. The typical flow would involve:
      • Creating a transaction in the billing system
      • Passing the transaction to a gateway
      • Submitting the transaction to a payment processor
      • Receiving information from the card network interchange
      • Capturing the transaction (or other actions, depending on processor response)
    • Vindicia: As mentioned above, we have combined the billing system and gateway (first three steps above) for more control over the transaction flow and greater payment success rates. This also gives more control over the retry logic by directly interpreting error codes from the payment processors into different retry flows. Billing companies & in-house systems that have not directly integrated to payment processors cannot compete with our results.

I’ll save descriptions of the other factors for another post. Optimizing customer retention is goal with constantly moving goalposts. When embarking down the path, merchants have a choice of either becoming experts at payment networks and card retry logic or choosing a partner that is already an established leader in the space.

Customer Data Ownership

Monday, August 9th, 2010

New companies are being formed every day – here in Silicon Valley, we see a lot of activity and buzz around all of the companies that are creating the next big thing. This is always exciting to follow, but for us here at Vindicia, it is doubly interesting. We take note of the business models and the target markets for these startups as we’ve built our business on meeting the needs of companies selling digital goods online to consumers. One trend we’ve been seeing lately is a sharp growth in the number of consumer-focused startups. This is great, but as many players are new to accepting direct payments from consumers, considerable thought should be given to the business strategies and how to be successful both near- and long-term.

(more…)

Payment Method Breakdown for Digital Commerce

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

Many of the questions we get asked about online billing are focused on how prevalent certain payment methods are and which ones our merchants should offer for their customers.

As our CEO discussed in his last webinar (Innovation in Business Models), the overall breakdown for payments by type across all ecommerce is summarized in the chart below with information from Javelin Research.

The 29% labeled “other” consists of everything from bank transfers (ACH / ECP), PayPal, mobile SMS billing and additional alternative payment methods such as BillMeLater. As this breakdown is measured across all ecommerce, the results are skewed towards internet retailers such as Amazon.com, Ticketmaster and airlines. For digital commerce (merchants only offering digital goods and services and driving revenue with subscriptions, virtual goods or virtual currencies), the results are even more biased towards payment cards. Also, the mix of alternative payments will be different with the most common ones being prepaid cards, PayPal, and SMS billing.

However, not all payment card brands are created equal – while we were digging through the mountains of data handled by CashBox recently, we found a nice high-level summary for the breakdown of the payment cards brands (credit & debit) that passed through our systems last year.

  • Visa: 63%
  • MasterCard: 26%
  • American Express: 9%
  • Discover: 2%

Or, to put it graphically:

As you can see, the overwhelming majority belongs to Visa, with Mastercard making up just over a quarter of card-based transactions. The other card brands (Carte Bleu, JCB, Diner’s) make up a negligible percent of transactions. Admittedly, this is skewed towards the US, as over 2/3 of our merchant’s customers pay in US Dollars. Combining this with the ecommerce statistic, this means that Visa is responsible for almost 45% of all transactions on the internet.

As always, your mileage may vary with customer demographic and product uniqueness, but the key takeaway for merchants should be to focus on the big 2 or 3 brands and think about reducing the number of payment card choices on your buy page.

Content Provider Rising

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

The news about Boxee using Vindicia CashBox for their new Payment Platform is about more than just a new client.  As we’ve written about here and here, we are in the midst of a revolution in how people consume online content.  This dynamic is upending digital distribution.  No longer are consumers restricted to experiencing content via specific channels.  Consume that subscription on my laptop on the train.  Check.  Sit in my family room and watch that same subscription on TV via the Boxee Box while eating popcorn.  Check.  As Gene wrote, Netflix knows he has one login across the different channels he uses to consume its content.

For content providers, the ability to deliver that compelling experience while managing the value of that offering across different channels is paramount.  That’s where Vindicia comes in.  The flexibility to define business models, from pay-per-view to subscriptions, and change them on the fly should be the prerogative of the content provider, not of any aggregator.  The primary value of the aggregator comes in helping the consumer choose across different content elements, not simply as a price setter or as a pipe.