Posts Tagged ‘billing ecosystem’

Subscription Billing’s Opposing Forces

Monday, December 6th, 2010

When going to market using subscription billing there are three diametrically opposed forces fighting you, the person who owns the active subscriber count as you try to acquire and retain the most customers possible. These forces are PCI, Account Updater, and customer data ownership. I want to focus on the balancing act between the first two.

These days, one of the primary mechanisms (other than using something like HOA on CashBox) to lowering the compliance burden and the actual risk of card disclosures is to use tokenization of those cards from your merchant acquirer, or gateway. Tokenization is simply an infrastructure at, for example, your gateway that will take the card you obtain from your customer on your checkout page, encrypt it for storage in their database, and hand you back a ‘handle’ to that card for future use. It doesn’t remove much of the compliance burden as credit cards still flow through your webserver and thus you still have to fully comply with PCI, but it does lower the risks of actual disclosure and shrinks the scope of your compliance efforts.

A surprising number of merchants are unaware of or don’t implement Account Updater, which is available from Visa and Mastercard in North America and some of Europe (Visa’s overview.) Account Updater functions in two ways. The primary way will automatically send card changes for customers that you’ve billed in the last six months to you so that you can seamlessly update their card before a billing event. The alternative way is for you to either proactively or after a billing failure ask if there has been an update on any given card. We’ve found that the absolute best result is to run Account Updater in both modes and spend time optimizing the latter mode for specific billing plan frequencies.

Unfortunately, the requirements of Account Updater and its impact on customer retention are at odds with the requirements of tokenization in support of PCI. Most of the tokenization projects at the various vendors do not take the product requirements of Account Updater into consideration. How does one query the Account Updater service for the new card that may have replaced the one that failed when all you have is a handle to the old card? Unless your vendor has specifically added this to their tokenization implementation you are hostage to their product roadmap to save some significant percentage of subscriber churn. When you recall that few vendors are focused on the challenges of digital content and services with subscriptions, and instead get the bulk of their revenue from one time purchase physical goods merchants it makes sense that these tokenization projects have usually not addressed Account Updater functionality.

At Vindicia, we’ve built CashBox to both take you completely out of the PCI compliance burden with HOA and to directly and richly implement Account Updater with our merchant acquirer partners. We’ve also made the commitment to you that your customer data is yours should you want to move on. Once you experience the revenue increase we deliver through increased customer retention, we doubt you will. But that commitment is there to help end the tension between customer data ownership and tokenization as well – which is something I’ll touch on in a later post.

Dangers of Half-Sourcing Your Billing System

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Accepting payments online is complicated, especially for companies selling digital goods and services. Because of the complicated nature, it seems like every day there is a new startup that is trying to revolutionize the industry with a new payment method, or billing solution to make accepting traditional payments less complex. Because of this, we are talking to more and more companies that are confused or that have been burned by choosing the wrong billing system.

Background

Let’s talk a little about what it takes to process payments online. The graphic below shows the major components necessary for a company to manage their customer’s billing plans, allow them access to the service, store their payment information and bill them on a regular basis through subscriptions or one-time purchases.

Digital Payments Landscape

(more…)

Oh Canada, or why TX success rates matter

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Of late, Vindicia has been welcoming quite a few Canadian based gaming, software, and social media companies. We also work in partnership with Tier 1 payment providers like Litle and Chase Paymentech. This brings up an interesting issue as these merchants think through their business structure and monetization plans.

Visa and Mastercard rules require that for US dollar transactions be presented by a merchant as a US domestic transaction, the merchant must have a “presence” in the US. The card associations rules may seem confounding but they’re much to do about making sure that the associations comply with US regulatory requirements and so that the associations and the card issuing banks can have some confidence about the risk created by the merchant for any given transaction. This leads to a requirement that Canadian and other foreign domiciled companies have to set up a “presence” in the US. The alternative is to use a Canadian merchant account to present international transactions priced in US Dollars.

The extra effort  may seem painful, but that leads to an important consideration every company should be considering and that is the statistical likelihood that any given credit/debit card transaction will go through at any given time. One of the reasons that Vindicia has chosen to work with the very best payment providers is that, on average, those payment providers are more likely to complete a successful transaction. We often see prospective clients compare one of the top provider’s pricing to that of less capable providers and the variable most often missing in their ROI analysis that offsets their sometimes perceived higher cost is the change in revenue that an even .05% better success rate completing one time and subscription transactions creates in terms of dollars saved. When the cost of payment processing is less than 3%, it doesn’t take a lot of 97%+ transactions to offset small cost deltas between the pricing of the best in class and all the rest.

Returning to Canadian companies, analyzing the average likelihood of success of any given transaction shows that the slight extra effort is well worth it. Requests to bill a US customer from what appears to be a foreign (even just Canadian) bank will lower the statistical likelihood of each transaction that a Canadian merchant attempts as card issuers assign more risk to non domestic transactions. It takes very few incomplete transactions (from customers who wanted to buy from you!) to offset the small cost of creating a US subsidiary in a favorable US taxing area.

Billing System Economics

Monday, March 1st, 2010

When evaluating billing solutions, companies have a lot of information to sort through and little help to do so.  After talking with countless merchants, I’ve found that companies typically fall into two categories during their search – startup or veteran.  Startup companies aren’t necessarily those who just launched their business,  but any company that is bringing a new product to market and lacks pre-existing infrastructure or payment expertise falls into this category.  Veterans have built a system at least once before and are very aware of the pitfalls and the overall payments ecosystem.

Startup companies should spend the time to educate themselves on the industry – payments and billing are complex and outright confusing.  The diagram below shows the many different pieces of a complete billing infrastructure.

The systems above are involved when  a customer makes their purchase until the transaction is submitted to the customer’s bank (that issued the credit card or funds the payment source) and eventually money ends up in the companies bank account.  A further description of these systems, and how outsourced billing systems add value are after the jump.

(more…)