Archive for March, 2010

A New Analyst Report on Subscription Billing

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Diversity Analysis, an independent consulting group that specializes in SaaS, cloud computing, and business strategy, recently published a report that includes 10 questions any online business should ask of its billing infrastructure.  I found the entire analysis worth reading and would like to highlight here a few quotes that reflect what many of our existing and potential customers have been pointing out are especially important to their business–

  • The need to be able to react to international taxation rates and laws, international currency issues, diverse payment methods and multiple languages are all factors that need to be taken into account.
  • In a business to consumer (B2C) operation, it is entirely possible that a business may have hundreds of thousands of customers and hence millions of billing transactions – scaling for subscription billing is therefore far more complex and time consuming than for traditional product companies who generally invoice on a one-time basis.
  • Of all these regulations, it is most critical that the billing solution is compliant with PCI. It is important that not only the infrastructure housing the billing solution is secure but also the flow of financial data, thereby ensuring data security standards.
  • Specialist and comprehensive billing systems are built to automate many parts of the billing and subscription process and in doing so both save money (in terms of time savings) and drive extra value (in terms of increased customer retention).
  • Similarly a billing and subscription service should be seen as a core part of the customer relationship management operation. It should give the business sufficient visibility into a customer’s needs to enable targeted marketing by way of up-selling or cross-selling.

The billing infrastructure wields a significant effect on your business, as Diversity Analysis emphasizes in its report.  In an upcoming post, I’ll go into some numerical depth on the value of CashBox for our clients.

You can download the report here.

Facebook Platform Trends

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Facebook is wildly popular, the latest comScore report shows that it currently has 38.3% reach across all internet users and they have doubled their unique visitors (111%) over 2009. Facebook’s success has led to a massive economy of third party applications built around their 400 million strong (and growing) user base.

Most of those applications make money through advertising or virtual goods and currency. Regardless of the mechanism, the underlying success factor is attracting a large number of users. That either creates an attractive demographic for advertisers, or creates a user base that will convert at some percentage into paying customers. Over the last few months Facebook made several changes that change the playing field for application developers monetizing on their platform.

1) The biggest of these changes is Facebook Payments. They’ve spent a lot of time working on building a payment infrastructure and it won’t be long before the only method of payment for applications will be Facebook Credits (at a 30% cut to Facebook ala Apple’s iTunes)- http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10460201-36.html

2) Secondly, there is an increasing shift towards limiting communication between applications and users, this has been ongoing for quite a while as Facebook balances notification spam and the major source of customer acquisition for many apps –  http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_silences_app_notification_spam.php

3)   Facebook has been shifting more and more burden onto developers. This is a good thing overall for the community and encouraging developers to contribute value for the community. They are basically forcing their developers to shift from being a dev shop into providing a full customer experience including customer service, policies and monitoring. http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Policy_Examples_and_Explanations

These trends will continue as Facebook continues to grow – it will be harder and harder to create a profitable business on their platform. The outstanding question now is will developers re-evaluate their relationship with Facebook and develop their own stand-alone portals?  The difference between offering an application on Facebook and offering it on a stand-alone site used to be quite large, but that gap is narrowing quickly. The freedom to control the customer experience is compelling, as is the ability to control customer billing and put more revenue in your bank account.

Will Facebook work with developers and entice them to stay on the platform? Or will it become a marketing channel for users to get acquainted with off-platform brands? Either way, it’s going to be an interesting year for social apps!

For more on the tradeoffs associated with “on or off” platform applications – Susan Wu of ohai! has a great post on her blog.

Experience Matters

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

Having spent nearly all of the last two decades working on billing systems, I’ve been through I-can’t-count-how-many different product selection exercises.  A typical scenario goes as follows:

  1. Someone in the organization decides that they’ve “had enough” and they start the ball rolling to select a new billing platform.
  2. A group of internal subject matter experts gather to consider the things a new billing system must do.
  3. These thoughts are collected in a “Requirements List”, which is watered, fertilized (and rarely, if ever, pruned).  The requirements list rapidly grows into a full blown RFP.
  4. RFP is sent to vendors.
  5. Shoes are shined, hair is combed, and promises are made that the platform being pitched will do exactly what you’ve asked.
  6. And then the real work begins…

The problem with this process is that it supposes that anyone out there has a billing system that matches exactly the way your team thinks of billing—and also that your team has nailed with 100% accuracy the needs of the organization not only today, but over the next 7-10 years.  I’ve been involved in projects ranging from straightforward SaaS deployments to “Enterprise Software” on up to “custom built” solutions.  No single delivery strategies has the corner on the market for success.

Many clients have told me that the one thing that tips the scales in favor of success is expertise.  Deploying a billing platform is a process filled with hundreds of small decisions.  Should I accept or reject this AVS return code?  Which screen layout will increase conversion rates?  When should we send email to our customers?  How should my retry cycle change based on my product offerings?  The key measurement of a services team is not only whether they know the answers to the questions, but do they know which questions to ask?  That is the key to maximizing value from the billing system.

My advice is simple:  when the experts gather and start watering the requirements tree, make sure they give consideration to the roots of the tree.  Make sure the services team of your billing partner can help guide you through not just the technical implementation, but the key business decisions that will have the greatest impact on your revenue.

Mis-information is worse than no information!

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

One of our techs pointed me to the blog of another company that is recent entrant into the billing market. I just finished reading it and am appalled at the blatant errors. As an example, it talks about doing a $.01 authorization which does not exist and has never existed. There were a few kernels of reliable info in this blog post, but how do you know which parts are valid? Oh well, all I can say is Qualify, Qualify, Qualify your sources. At a minimum, ask a 2nd person who has some verifiable background to comment. I have been involved in electronic payments for 30 years. Even with that I know what I do not know could fill a large repository and will admit that I do not know something.

It is no wonder people are confused about payments!!!

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Unfortunately a lot is written about payments by well meaning writers who have no idea what they are writing about.  Take this article (please) as an example;  http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_futureofmoney_move/

It is completely inaccurate  and defines the concept of comparing apples to oranges.  Matter of fact, it is more like comparing apples to popcorn.

Luckily a lot of other folks, who do know something about this realm, pounced on this article as well.

It screams a real lesson – qualify your sources of info!!!