Archive for March, 2010

Genuine progress in fraud prevention!

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Wells Fargo announced a few days ago that they were taking advantage of a new Visa feature. Of course, I had to immediately enroll. You then receive text message alerts when certain types and size of transactions occur. The idea is that if it isn’t you, you can immediately respond and become part of the fraud prevention paradigm. I was somewhat skeptical, as usual, but as it turned out hours later I was picking up my wife’s BMW from the shop (ouch $1200!!!) and while I was still standing at the check-out desk, my phone got a text reporting the transaction to me. It was very descriptive, telling me that my “Wells Fargo Card ending in xx was used at xxx Motors in xxx town for $xxxx.xx ….

This is real progress.

I had previously enrolled in their alerting offer but due to the number of different acquirers and issuers and the batch nature of credit card processing, these often did not arrive until days later.

Since, Visa’s switch is involved in the authorization of all Visa transactions, these alerts can go out literally in real time.

Of course someone will try and call this a mobile payment! (see my article in Venture Beat!)

http://venturebeat.com/2010/03/10/what-will-it-take-to-make-mobile-payments-mainstream-in-the-us/

Oh Canada, or why TX success rates matter

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Of late, Vindicia has been welcoming quite a few Canadian based gaming, software, and social media companies. We also work in partnership with Tier 1 payment providers like Litle and Chase Paymentech. This brings up an interesting issue as these merchants think through their business structure and monetization plans.

Visa and Mastercard rules require that for US dollar transactions be presented by a merchant as a US domestic transaction, the merchant must have a “presence” in the US. The card associations rules may seem confounding but they’re much to do about making sure that the associations comply with US regulatory requirements and so that the associations and the card issuing banks can have some confidence about the risk created by the merchant for any given transaction. This leads to a requirement that Canadian and other foreign domiciled companies have to set up a “presence” in the US. The alternative is to use a Canadian merchant account to present international transactions priced in US Dollars.

The extra effort  may seem painful, but that leads to an important consideration every company should be considering and that is the statistical likelihood that any given credit/debit card transaction will go through at any given time. One of the reasons that Vindicia has chosen to work with the very best payment providers is that, on average, those payment providers are more likely to complete a successful transaction. We often see prospective clients compare one of the top provider’s pricing to that of less capable providers and the variable most often missing in their ROI analysis that offsets their sometimes perceived higher cost is the change in revenue that an even .05% better success rate completing one time and subscription transactions creates in terms of dollars saved. When the cost of payment processing is less than 3%, it doesn’t take a lot of 97%+ transactions to offset small cost deltas between the pricing of the best in class and all the rest.

Returning to Canadian companies, analyzing the average likelihood of success of any given transaction shows that the slight extra effort is well worth it. Requests to bill a US customer from what appears to be a foreign (even just Canadian) bank will lower the statistical likelihood of each transaction that a Canadian merchant attempts as card issuers assign more risk to non domestic transactions. It takes very few incomplete transactions (from customers who wanted to buy from you!) to offset the small cost of creating a US subsidiary in a favorable US taxing area.

We pay you

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

I was chatting with Sanjay today and we were reviewing some monthly retention metrics for our clients. Just on the additional retention we create for our clients and with the simple assumption of more than $1M in annual revenues, our client’s first year on CashBox is net free or better. In the second year we’ll be paying our clients to use CashBox. That includes our client’s internal cost to implement CashBox and migrate existing subscribers. When you add in recovered chargebacks, PCI cost savings, broader payment method support, tax service savings, and no gateway charges, we’re usually paying our customers to use CashBox in the first 6 months.

And we’re not just paying our clients in dollars. We’re paying them in the currency of compound interest created by longer customer lives.

“Freemium” anyone?

$40 Million

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

In my previous post, I alluded to statistics that highlight how Vindicia CashBox helps clients retain customers and thus lift revenue streams.  In a press release issued at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco in early March, we mentioned these numbers:

  • Over the past year, thanks to our retry logic, Account Updater, and other retention capabilities, our clients gained 10-25 percent more of the customers who failed in their initial attempts to renew subscriptions.  We have seen this trend across all the vertical markets we serve.
  • Take those percentages and aggregate the dollars across our client base over the past year, you get a total of $40 million.  More importantly, this number grows every day as we add clients and as our existing clients’ business expands.
  • Our transaction volume has risen by about 45 percent over the past year: We now handle about 250,000 transactions every day while remaining PCI-compliant at the highest levels for the fifth year.

Speaking of PCI compliance, its juxtaposition with cloud computing is catching more and more attention.  If you’re attending Cloud Computing Expo in NYC in April, check out our CTO Brett Thomas’s presentation.  You’ll hear something very novel that will radically change your thinking about PCI compliance in the cloud.  I promise.  Don’t miss that talk!

Don’t Waste the Internet on TV?

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Recently, Avner Rosen of Boxee debated Mark Cuban about the future of television. I didn’t get to see the debate (GDC overlaps with SXSW) but I saw Mark Cuban’s post debate post. It’s actually kind of funny as Mark had always been a visionary in the past, but it is what happens when you make a major capital investment in things like HDNET it colors your perspective. His basic thesis is that either because “Application Specific Networks” or the large capital investments in distribution infrastructure are pretty efficient, there is no reason that TV will migrate to the internet.

AOL proved that “Application Specific Networks” are an excellent way to lose a whole lot of money. It was profitable while it lasted but AOL is now a shell of itself and has to reverse its walled garden to hope to keep the small business left. Mark’s comment that there isn’t a revenue model to get content providers to move is just funny. Napsterization comes to everyone. My big question for Mark, though, is how did those large capital investments in shipping, warehouse, and retail capacity work out for Tower Records

As seems to be common in these major channel disruptions, people seem to be focusing on simply replicating the old distribution channel. TV over the internet is going to be about a lot more than just access to TV and movies. It’s going to be about being able to use video in new and different ways that will be impossible to replicate over a satellite and a waste of bandwidth over last mile connections that could otherwise be part of the total IP bandwidth of the last mile bandwidth instead.

I can’t wait to turn my TV provider off. We’re close.